Core capability 04 of 12
Deal Intelligence
Transaction context on demand: who bought what, at what price, on what rationale, and how the market has priced comparable deals.
Transaction overview with buyer, target and consideration
Strategic rationale reconstructed from disclosure
Comparable transaction set with multiples
Risk factors and completion conditions
Intelligence interface
Transaction file
Deal Intelligence · Example Holdings Ltd.
--:--:-- UTC
Deal value
$412.0M
Enterprise value
EV/EBITDA
9.4×
vs. median 8.6×
Stake
76%
Controlling
Consideration
Cash + stock
68% / 32%
Comparables
11
Sector, 36 months
Comparable deal EV/EBITDA
Selected transactions
7.9×
8.1×
8.6×
9.4×
10.2×
Deal A
Deal B
Deal C
Deal D
Deal E
Comparable transactions
| Transaction | EV/EBITDA | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Example Holdings / Target A | 9.4× | Mar 2026 |
| Peer B / Target C | 8.6× | Nov 2025 |
| Peer D / Target E | 7.9× | Aug 2025 |
| Sponsor F / Target G | 10.2× | Apr 2025 |
| Peer H / Target I | 8.1× | Jan 2025 |
| Median (11 deals) | 8.6× | 36 months |
AI analysis
The transaction prices at a 9% premium to the trailing comparable median, justified in disclosure by route density rather than cost synergies. Two of the eleven comparables involved distressed sellers and should be excluded from the working median.
Evidence trail
[1]
Annual Report
FY25 · p. 84, segment note
[2]
Earnings Filing
Q4 FY25 · statement of cash flows
[3]
Company Presentation
Investor day · slide 22
[4]
Regulatory Filing
Related-party disclosure
How teams use Deal Intelligence
Deal screening
Build a defensible comparable set in one pass.
Board material
Cite rationale and precedent directly from disclosure.
Post-deal review
Compare outcomes against the rationale that was stated.