Private-company intelligence without building a research department.
Unlisted and pre-IPO holdings assessed on structure and disclosure rather than on what the company chooses to present.
Private holdings are assessed on what the company sends, because there is no research floor to do more.
Unlisted companies report less, later, and in formats that resist comparison.
A two-person office cannot staff forensic work on every holding.
For family-owned businesses, structure and related parties are the analysis.
The picture is the one the company chose to present.
A holding is reviewed when accounts arrive rather than when something changes.
Without the drivers behind it, the mark cannot be challenged.
A standing intelligence file on every private holding.
Sanclarity is designed to assemble ownership, financial condition, related parties, valuation and risk into one file per private asset — and to keep it current as registry and disclosure material appears.
The company identified and separated from similarly named entities.
The analyst reviews and challenges the output rather than manually reconstructing every exhibit. Designed to reduce analyst reconstruction — judgment, review and approval stay with the analyst.
Decision-ready, evidence-linked output.
Source → reasoning → structured output → evidence → analyst review. The intent is minimal analyst reconstruction, not an AI-generated paragraph that has to be rebuilt before it can be used.
One file per subject, assembled rather than written.
A position with the reasoning behind it, not a summary.
Intrinsic and market-based views with assumptions exposed.
Findings ranked by severity, each with supporting evidence.
Flows, counterparties and treatment set against the disclosure.
Changes that touch a stated assumption, not a notification feed.
An answer you cannot check is an opinion.
Every figure and finding keeps the disclosure it was read from, at the line level. That is what makes the output reviewable — a colleague, a committee or a regulator can open the source rather than take the conclusion on trust.
Users are responsible for reviewing and validating outputs before relying on them for material decisions.