Following the evidence, not the narrative.
Financial forensics is the disciplined reading of financial and corporate disclosure to identify what the record supports, what it does not, and where the two diverge.
Sanclarity AI Research · Written and maintained by the company's research function, led by Kanishk Tyagi, Co-Founder, Chief AI Officer and Head of Research. About the team →
A forensic finding is a claim about the record.
Forensic analysis does not begin with a suspicion. It begins with the disclosure, and it produces statements that can be traced back to it — a reported finding, a risk signal, an evidence-backed assessment.
The discipline is in the restraint: stating what the record supports, distinguishing a reported association from an established one, and leaving conclusions that require legal determination to the people qualified to make them.
Related-party analysis
Identifying counterparties connected to the company by ownership, directorship or address, and matching them against revenue, receivable and payment detail for the same periods.
Transaction tracing
Following flows between resolved entities across periods and jurisdictions, recording origin, destination and the treatment applied in the accounts.
Financial inconsistencies
Where two disclosures about the same fact do not agree — a segment total against a consolidated figure, a cash movement against a stated use of proceeds — the inconsistency is the finding, stated as such.
Asset and value analysis
Testing whether recorded asset values are consistent with the operating evidence around them: utilisation, maintenance spend, and disposal history.
Ownership networks
Reconstructing the structure around a subject so that a risk signal can be attributed to specific entities rather than to a name.
Cross-border structures
Understanding what each jurisdiction in a chain discloses, and therefore where the chain becomes unverifiable rather than complete.
Evidence chains
Every finding decomposed into the sources supporting it, each openable at the line it was read from. This is what makes a forensic conclusion defensible under challenge.
Output is phrased as a reported finding, a risk signal or an evidence-backed assessment.
Signals are ranked, and the ranking carries the reason it was assigned.
Alternatives are weighed and ruled out explicitly rather than left unstated.
The platform assembles and reasons. The conclusion is reviewed, challenged and approved by a person.
No benchmark results or accuracy claims are made on this page. Outputs should be reviewed and validated by the user before being relied upon for material decisions.